Reed fall just short at Baldock
Reed IV (144 all out) lost at Baldock (157-5) by 14 runs.ANOTHER week, another chance missed for Reed s fourth team. Winning the toss, Baldock decided to bat but the visitors took early wickets through Alex West (12-2-35-2) before Watts (38) and Plums (6
Reed IV (144 all out) lost at Baldock (157-5) by 14 runs.
ANOTHER week, another chance missed for Reed's fourth team.
Winning the toss, Baldock decided to bat but the visitors took early wickets through Alex West (12-2-35-2) before Watts (38) and Plums (66) put on a successful partnership to steady the Baldock ship.
Reed captain Peter Baker (10-1-41-2) had both Watts and Plums caught by Hunter Diack and there was also impressive bowling from Lewis Fitzgerald (8-1-28-0) and Ian Roberts (11-8-12-0), both of whom kept the run rate low, as Baldock finished their 47 overs on 157-5.
You may also want to watch:
The hosts then made the interesting decision to open the bowling with spinner J Bracken (15.3-2-45-5), and this decision was proved the right one as Baker was out on the second ball of Reed's innings having a top edge caught behind.
Darren Radford (16) then joined the returning David Johnson (22), playing his first game in several years, as the two re-started the innings.
- 1 Sir Tom Jones set for green, green grass of Newmarket Racecourses
- 2 Bassingbourn Barracks: New chapter for Army’s flagship operational training centre
- 3 Person dies after being struck by train in Cambridge
- 4 Access between platforms to be restored at Royston station
- 5 How many people in our area have been 'pinged' by NHS COVID app?
- 6 Arrests made in connection with large-scale money laundering operation
- 7 What are the outstanding schools in Hertfordshire?
- 8 Police hunt 36-year-old wanted for harassment and restraining order breaches
- 9 Parents' tribute to caring community as they continue push for new specialist facilities
- 10 Thatcher returns after 30 years to repair cottage where he met his wife
After a potentially promising partnership was ended early with both out, Reed were once again in trouble at 49-3.
None the less the visitors still had enough ability in their ranks to give their target a good chasing and Marcus Baker (33) led the way.
He was supported by Sam Deville (8) and Hunter Diack (11) but Reed hit a road block as wickets again started to fall once they had passed 100.
With the loss of Alan Ward (20) it was left to the tail to find the runs required, but despite a good effort Reed lost their final wicket 14 runs short of victory.