Toilets to close despite petition
PUBLIC toilets at the Royston bus station are to close in spite of a 555-signature protest petition being handed over to councillors. But £155,000 is to be spent on toilets at Market Hill, Royston, and £15,000 on improving facilities at The Cross. Cllr F
PUBLIC toilets at the Royston bus station are to close in spite of a 555-signature protest petition being handed over to councillors.
But £155,000 is to be spent on toilets at Market Hill, Royston, and £15,000 on improving facilities at The Cross.
Cllr F John Smith told members of the Royston area committee: "The toilets at the bus station are no longer viable to keep open. Indeed, it's surprising they have been open for so long."
But Cllr Tony Hunter said he would like to see whether a low-cost toilet could be introduced at the bus station at The Warren.
You may also want to watch:
And Cllr Doug Drake said the closing of the public toilets was "stupid" and a "backward view". He said the decision was "almost a joke".
Cllr Robert Inwood said the closure of the toilets did not make sense.
- 1 Ex-footballers set for charity match to raise money for hospital cardiology department
- 2 Motorhome and car involved in A505 crash
- 3 Hotel on Duxford IWM site given go-ahead after council re-vote
- 4 Ski trip interest 'peaks' at Melbourn Village College
- 5 Raise the roof! Church lead replaced two years on from theft
- 6 Do you think 'Freedom Day' should go ahead on June 21?
- 7 Have you visited the Orwell Clunch Pit? New sign tells of unique site's significance
- 8 How do North East Herts and South Cambs fare in the latest boundary review proposals?
- 9 Magpas chief executive 'surprised and honoured' by MBE
- 10 Police officer cleared of misconduct for stopping driver because he was Black
A petition calling on the toilets to be saved had been handed in to the committee from veteran campaigner Terry Hutt.
Mr Hutt said as a community driver he understood the need for toilets at the bus station were a priority for elderly people.
He said the planning behind the scheme was not on the same "wavelength" as the needs for residents.