Therfield Heath inquiry: Questions continue about legality of land swap planning application

PUBLISHED: 13:17 07 February 2018

The inquiry into the degregistration of a portion of heathland near Briary Lane and Sun Hill began on Tuesday at the Coombes Community Centre in Royston. Picture: David Hatton

The inquiry into the degregistration of a portion of heathland near Briary Lane and Sun Hill began on Tuesday at the Coombes Community Centre in Royston. Picture: David Hatton


The question as to whether the application to degregister Royston heathland and swap it with land of a similar size near Therfield was made legally continues to blight the heath inquiry.

Therfield HeathTherfield Heath

At the start of proceedings on Tuesday last week, objector Clive Hall suggested that the planning application “wasn’t legal” as the applicant, The Therfield Regulation, didn’t own the land.

Application supporters’ advocate Deborah Sharples had previously told the inquiry, led by inspector Mark Yates, that the landowners are the trustees of The Therfield Regulation Trust charity, but they are the same people as the Conservators who used to call themselves The Therfield Regulation.”

When clerk David Smith was cross-examined by objector Clive Hall on Monday, he was asked how many separate roles he fulfilled.

He said he was clerk to the Conservators, who wear three hats and that he “supports them in all of their three hats – Conservators, managing trustees and property holding trustees of The Therfield Regulation Trust.

Mr Hall said that as part of proper legal proceedings, the application by the Therfield Regulation for deregistration and exchange must be signed by the chairman and the clerk.

Mr Smith looked at the evidence, and confirmed it was only signed by chairman John King on behalf of the Therfield Regulation.

Mr Hall also put it to the clerk that on The Charity Commission For England and Wales’ website, The Conservators of Therfield Heath and Greens was a working name of The Therfield Regulation Trust, making them not two entities, but one.

Mr Smith said: “The relationship between Conservators and the Therfield Regulation Trust has satisfied our previous solicitors, who, when I was first appointed had to check the minutes of every meeting.

“Unfortunately he had to take early retirement and the Conservators decided to go to a new firm of solicitiors with expertise. We chose them because of strength of charity law – they investigate position of clients and they are satisified the way we operate is correct. The Charity Commission has no questions about it either.”

About the line of questioning, advocate Mrs Sharples said: “It is predicated on the assumption that Mr Hall is aware of a legal position, and we don’t accept that position is accurate.”

The inquiry at the Coombes Community Centre in Royston’s Burns Road is expected to continue until Thursday.

Related articles


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Royston Crow visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Royston Crow staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Royston Crow account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

Most Read

Latest from the Royston Crow

Hot Jobs

Show Job Lists