'Green' plan turned down
PLANS for a green eco-community development have been turned down. This was in spite of the current site being described as unsightly and unquestionably a scar on the landscape . The plans submitted to North Herts District Council involved the develo
PLANS for a "green" eco-community development have been turned down.
This was in spite of the current site being described as "unsightly" and "unquestionably a scar on the landscape".
The plans submitted to North Herts District Council involved the development of 14 eco-dwellings on a site at Sunnymead Farm in Station Road, Ashwell.
But planning officer Richard Tiffin told members of the planning control committee in a report: "Sustainable development cannot be defined simply as the production of zero-carbon homes."
He was concerned that any carbon savings would be lost due to the need of residents using private vehicles.
"From a sustainable point of view this is not an ideal site as it would un-doubtedly rely heavily on the use of private vehicles," he said.
- 1 Garden centre to host royal treat for Queen's Platinum Jubilee
- 2 Royston Methodists welcome leading figures to church
- 3 New mayor elected in historic moment for Royston Town Council
- 4 Stalking Protection Order issued to Herts man after obsessive behaviour towards ex
- 5 Met Office weather: Yellow storm and flood warning for East of England
- 6 World IBD Day: Crohn's disease sufferer speaks out
- 7 Beer from Lidl and vegan chocolates among items recalled over safety fears
- 8 Queen, Alicia Keys and Diana Ross to star in BBC's Platinum Jubilee Party
- 9 Therfield pub celebrates lockdown heroes
- 10 Iceland offers over 60s discount on shopping bill every week
"The applicant's attempt to specify the scheme and buildings as a self-contained eco-community is admirable if not entirely convincing."
Mr Tiffin said that simply allowing a development in order to tidy a site would be a "risky approach" and could set a precedent for the future.
He did admit, however, that the scheme posed some "interesting planning questions" which were seeking to take advantage of the Government's keen-ness to see sustainable developments.
"This submission begs questions of principle and, quite rightly, seeks to test the council's interpretation of the Government's sustainable development agenda," said Mr Tiffin.
Earlier Mr Tiffin said that residents in the area had opposed the scheme over such issues as an increase in noise and traffic and the number of properties being planned for the site.
He added, however, that a scheme submitted for a smaller scale development may allow a more positive view.