Don't let a child be hurt on road
IN response to last week s letter about cyclists riding on pavements, I would say do not force our children on to busy, dangerous roads. The law passed in 1835 was to stop carriages driving on the footpath. When the new law on cycling on the footpath was
IN response to last week's letter about cyclists riding on pavements, I would say do not force our children on to busy, dangerous roads.
The law passed in 1835 was to stop carriages driving on the footpath.
When the new law on cycling on the footpath was passed in 1999, the Home Office advised that "the introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users".
Chief police officers acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children, are afraid to cycle on the road.
You may also want to watch:
I am sure none of us has any complaints about people using their mobility scooters on the footpath. The Highway Code rule 38 for mobility scooters even advises that "pavements are safer than roads and should be used when available".
There have been enough road accidents in Royston recently. Don't make the next one a child on a bike.
- 1 New care home for Royston unanimously approved
- 2 Train services resume after earlier disruption at Royston
- 3 Cambridge Country Show promises 'something for everybody'
- 4 Stunning snap causes stir online
- 5 7 of the most expensive houses on the market in Cambridgeshire right now
- 6 Huge splash of support for Meldreth diver Dan Goodfellow
- 7 Roystonian becomes president of American broadband firm
- 8 No Olympic medal for Daniel Goodfellow after synchronized diving heartbreak
- 9 'Father' found guilty of murdering his teenage daughter
- 10 Person dies after being struck by train in Cambridge
Goodwood Road, Royston