Common sense has prevailed
JUST over two years ago, I wrote to The Crow with concerns about the imposition of an alcohol free zone in Royston. Today, I am delighted to say that, counter to my initial misgivings, the current arrangements of a Special Designated Area, (which inclu
JUST over two years ago, I wrote to The Crow with concerns about the imposition of an "alcohol free zone" in Royston.
Today, I am delighted to say that, counter to my initial misgivings, the current arrangements of a Special Designated Area, (which includes the Priory Memorial Gardens), are a triumph of common sense over authoritarianism.
Following a number of enquiries, which culminated in speaking to a duty police sergeant the following was made clear to me.
The notion of "alcohol free zone" in Royston is a misnomer and misleading.
You may also want to watch:
The reality is that anyone over the age of 18 continues to be free to drink alcohol within the Special Designated Area, provided they are not drunk and incapable, drunk and disorderly, and not engaging in activity either likely to cause a breach of the peace or occasioning a breach of the peace.
An offence is only committed under the following circumstances.
Most Read
- 1 CCTV appeal after vehicles interfered with in Royston
- 2 Royston man to stand trial for permitting production of cannabis
- 3 Heath threatened with 'eyesore' borehole kiosks
- 4 What's next for Thakeham development after Local Plan sites revealed?
- 5 University of Hertfordshire paedophile caught with more than 500 child abuse images
- 6 Villagers launch bid to raise £200,000 for 14th-century church paintings
- 7 Hertfordshire's adult social care workers honoured at award ceremony
- 8 Herts libraries service could be transferred to public service mutual
- 9 Help on offer for residents as Universal Credit cut looms
- 10 Busy week for Royston firefighting crews as they keep people safe
* Those under-18 drinking alcohol
* Those who supply alcohol to those an under-18 commit an offence.
* Anyone engaging in the type of behaviour indicated above also commits an offence.
* Anyone who is drinking and continues to do so after being required by police to cease drinking.
The penalty for failure to cease drinking is £500, soon to rise to £2,500.
In other words, the police have the usual, wide discretion that the public order acts have for a long time bestowed upon them.
I am glad to see that common sense has prevailed, in favour of an outright ban, the nature of which this country is getting tired.
ROBIN PLUMMER
Royston
