Act must remain to stop the usual stonewalling
I WOULD like to thank Oliver Heald for speaking out against the Government s proposed dilution of the powers of the Freedom of Information Act. In my own experience, it would appear that I have been extremely fortunate, as when the Act was introduced at
I WOULD like to thank Oliver Heald for speaking out against the Government's proposed dilution of the powers of the Freedom of Information Act.
In my own experience, it would appear that I have been extremely fortunate, as when the Act was introduced at the start of 2005, I had just lodged an application to an employment tribunal, where the respondents were Herts County Council, and a Hertfordshire School.
Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act, I was able to obtain valuable documentation: county policy documents, minutes of governors' meetings, that would otherwise have been withheld.
Even so, I experienced considerable delay and prevarication from the county's legal department, but as the law at that time was on my side, I was able to persist, and eventually succeeded.
You may also want to watch:
As well as the requested documentation, I even received a letter of apology for the delay from the county council chief executive.
The Crow reported the success of my tribunal application earlier this year.
- 1 New bus and cycle shelters to help bring sustainable travel to town
- 2 Yellow weather warning of thunderstorms in Herts
- 3 Royston Kite Festival decision 'under review' as lockdown extended
- 4 Freedom Day: More than half of Herts residents welcome delay to lockdown easing
- 5 Ex-footballers set for charity match to raise money for hospital cardiology department
- 6 Bassingbourn reverse trend of losses at Helions Bumpstead with fine win
- 7 Two lorry crash blocks part of A14 in Cambridgeshire
- 8 Agricultural expert 'over the moon' with MBE
- 9 Motorhome and car involved in A505 crash
- 10 Hotel on Duxford IWM site given go-ahead after council re-vote
Whether the outcome would have been so favourable without this documentary evidence, provided albeit reluctantly by the respondents, I do not know, but I doubt it.
We take a justifiable pride in our democratic society, and I am alarmed at the Government's restrictive proposals regarding this important Act.
Just because it is proving to be an embarrassment for public authorities to provide the information requested seems a poor reason to shut down the whole process, which is obviously its desired objective.
From my experience, local authorities are pretty expert at stonewalling on their own account, without the system actually providing them with legitimate reasons for delay.
Moving goal posts when things get difficult seems to be an increasingly common strategy used by this Government.
Even in today's news, fundamental changes in planning laws are apparently afoot. This will particularly affect this area.
Funny how it is announced immediately after Uttlesford District Council's recent victory at Stansted.
But that's another story.