Therfield Heath land swap refused by Planning Inspectorate

PUBLISHED: 16:01 18 May 2018 | UPDATED: 17:43 23 May 2018

The release land at the top of Sun Hill. Picture: David Hatton

The release land at the top of Sun Hill. Picture: David Hatton

David Hatton

The application to deregister common land on Royston’s Therfield Heath and sell it off for housing has been refused by the Planning Inspectorate, it has been announced today.

The entrance of the replacement land to the west of New Road in Therfield. Picture: David HattonThe entrance of the replacement land to the west of New Road in Therfield. Picture: David Hatton

The application to deregister heathland near Sun Hill and Briary Lane – replacing it with woodland of a similar size to the west of New Road in Therfield – was initially made by The Therfield Regulation Trust in March last year.

An eight-day public inquiry concluded in February this year, with inspector Mark Yates hearing evidence from supporters and objectors.

The Conservators of Therfield Heath and Greens, who manage the heath and also operate as trustees of TRT, gave evidence saying that the possible £1.4 million raised from selling the land would be reinvested into running costs and sporting facilities.

In the decision letter published today, Mr Yates said: “While there is uncertainty regarding the extent to which particular proposals within the draft management plan will be implemented, the intention to spend some of the funds raised by the sale of the release land on the maintenance and improvement of the common would clearly be of benefit to the neighbourhood and the public in general.

Therfield HeathTherfield Heath

“Certain proposals would assist with the preservation of the biodiversity on the common. However, in respect of the proposals for the sporting facilities, it cannot be determined to any reasonable extent whether these will be implemented and the weight to be attached to these proposals will be limited.

“I do not consider that significant weight should be attached to the provision of eight additional homes.

“The exchange itself will lead to the loss of land that has in the past been used for recreational purposes and this will impact upon those people who live in the immediate locality of the release land.

“The replacement land has a different character, but this does not necessarily make it less valuable. In landscape terms, I find the replacement land to have greater value.

“Following consideration of the potential benefits put forward in support of the application and my other conclusions regarding the release land and the replacement land, I do not find on balance that consent for an exchange of common land should be granted.”

Related articles


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Royston Crow visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Royston Crow staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Royston Crow account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

More news stories


There’s a new Mandarin teacher at Melbourn Village College.

The A505 has been closed near Royston following a crash.

Yesterday, 12:01

Regulars at the only pub in Odsey have spoken of their concern about the future of the historic watering hole, saying the owners “are running it into the ground.”

Fri, 15:33

An on-duty Royston firefighter who drove his fire engine at speed onto a roundabout with the result that it toppled over and killed a pedestrian was today found not guilty of causing his death by dangerous driving.

Most read stories

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

Read the Royston Crow e-edition E-edition

Newsletter Sign Up

Royston Crow weekly newsletter
Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter

Our Privacy Policy