Questions over Herts cops DNA procedure

09:26 13 June 2012

Hertfordshire Police badge

Hertfordshire Police badge


DNA taken from people, who turned out to be innocent, has not been destroyed by Hertfordshire Constabulary – and the force could not even say how many people’s genetic material it had kept.

Despite a request for transparency under the Freedom of Information Act, the Constabulary was unable to answer a series of questions from anti-surveillance pressure group Big Brother Watch.

The issue has come into sharp focus when the Government’s Protection of Freedoms Act gained Royal Assent at the beginning of last month.

It requires that some DNA and fingerprint samples must be destroyed.

But, in a response to Big Brother Watch’s request, Hertfordshire Constabulary was unable to confirm the total number of people that had their DNA taken in the last three years (January 1 2009 to November 30 2011).

A spokeswoman simply referred to another organisation, the National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA), which holds figures and breakdowns for the years 2010 and 2011.

The NPIA figures showed as at the end of July 2010 there were 92,371 samples on the force’s database.

By the end of August last year there were 98,935 – an increase on the previous set of statistics of 6,564.

Secondly when asked for the total number of people whose DNA was taken by the police in the same time period, the number of those who were subsequently charged with an offence, Big Brother Watch was simply told: “No information is held.”

And finally when quizzed on the number of a DNA profiles subsequently destroyed for those individuals in question not charged with an offence in the time period, the spokeswoman said: “The Constabulary does not routinely destroy DNA when someone is not charged; therefore no information is held.”

Cambridgeshire Constabulary were more forthcoming with information, revealing it had taken 13,425 samples and deleted 1,687 records in the same period.

The Crow posed a further two queries with the force, they were: “Does Hertfordshire Constabulary have a system of distinguishing DNA profiles of those convicted from those neither charged nor found guilty?”

We also asked about the possible cost of destroying samples.

But the Crow was told these would not be answered immediately and to pose the questions under the Freedom of Information Act – a process that could take as long as 20 working days.


More news stories

Yesterday, 16:52
Tracey Richards, Gillian Knight and Karen Barry of the Heathlands Animal Sanctuary.

A dog’s not just for Christmas – but will strays in the pound even see Yuletide? Over-population of stray dogs in Ireland has led to many being put down, and rescuers are attempting to find them new homes in Britain.

Saturday, November 28, 2015
David, owner ofFighting Fit gym at the Royston Heath, sustained a serious orbital socket

A Royston gym owner who had to undergo corrective eye socket reconstruction after a play fight with his sons ended in serious injury is giving something back to hospital staff who treated him to say thank you.

Friday, November 27, 2015
Royston residents Anne Walls and Glen Stanway have lost reception on their EE networks around Royston

A playgroup owner and film extra have spoken of their intense frustration after being left without phone signal for almost two weeks in Royston.

Friday, November 27, 2015

Thieves stole cash after breaking into a Royston shop in Church Lane.


Most read stories

Digital Edition

Read the Royston Crow e-edition E-edition