Melbourn Parish Council awaiting judge’s decision on redaction before publishing grievance report

PUBLISHED: 09:58 24 October 2017 | UPDATED: 10:36 02 November 2017

Publishing the grievance report was discussed by Melbourn Parish Council yesterday evening.

Publishing the grievance report was discussed by Melbourn Parish Council yesterday evening.


A grievance report into Melbourn Parish Council’s conduct still hasn’t been published – as the authority awaits a further redaction to be approved by a judge.

The grievance report arose after a complaint was lodged against former parish council chairman Bob Tulloch last year.

The situation saw a number of members resign in quick succession, over matters related to the authority’s conduct.

The decision has been made by tribunal Judge Chris Hughes for the council to disclose the report with the redaction of all the names of those not on the council or directly involved in the matter.

The council has said another redaction – not disclosed – needs to be made, and is awaiting the decision after putting it to the judge.

At the meeting, held at the Melbourn Community Hub yesterday evening, chair Julie Norman said: “Back in early 2016 the parish council as it was then voted not to accept the grievance report, members of public made FOIs over the summer the parish council received letters from solicitors saying legal action could be taken if the report was published.

“It then went to the Information Commissioners Office, and when council began meeting again in October 2016, I think it’s fair to say at the time the majority of people thought the ICO would tell the parish council to publish the report, but in the end the ICO decided not to.

“A member of the public appealed that decision and the upshot of this is that the report can now be published.

“Certain names will need to be redacted – for everyone who was not a councillor, the clerk or the complainant.

“One further redaction needs to be made, and because this is a legal process permission has had to be sought by a tribunal judge.

“For tonight what we will be asking is whether councillors agree that the report is published with redactions you have seen, but with that other redaction as well.”

The vote was passed with 12 in favour and two abstentions. The meeting also heard that the parish council will publish the report in the form it was submitted to the council, and will publish the substituted decision notice – which covers why the ICO had made the decision they did and why the appeal to publish it has been successful.

Related articles


Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Royston Crow visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Royston Crow staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Royston Crow account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

More news stories

Yesterday, 17:51

There’s less than one week left to respond to Hertfordshire County Council’s Local Transport Plan, which the council says will mean a major shakeup of the county’s transport networks in a bid to help them cope in the future.

Yesterday, 15:45

A development of almost 300 homes on the edge of Royston is one step closer after the planning application received the go-ahead on Wednesday night.

Yesterday, 15:09

North Herts District Council’s members last night voted themselves a two-per-cent allowance rise.

With councils being ordered to build thousands of new homes by the Government, the question of whether there are any alternative approaches to getting people housed is an important one.


Most read stories


Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

Read the Royston Crow e-edition E-edition

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter