Majority against plans for 160 new homes in Melbourn being ‘forced on the village’

PUBLISHED: 12:14 25 July 2017 | UPDATED: 13:21 26 July 2017

Countryside Properties plans to build 160 new homes in Cambridge Road. Picture: Clive Porter

Countryside Properties plans to build 160 new homes in Cambridge Road. Picture: Clive Porter

Clive Porter

Scores of people packed into the Melbourn’s community hub on Friday to take part in the consultation for proposals of 160 new homes in the village.

The development site Countryside Properties propose to build on is along Cambridge Road, linking the village college end of Melbourn with the A10 near the Wyevale Garden Centre.

A parish council spokeswoman said: “The great majority of residents attending expressed and gave their concerns over the continued speculative development being forced on the village.

“The parish council has stressed on many occasions in the last four years about the severe impact on local services such as health, education and traffic.

“The worst potentially of all this is the issue of sewage. The loss of very good agricultural land is also of concern.”

Parish councillors were on hand to help residents with finding specific information within the submitted plans, so that they could make an informed decision.

Nearly 90 villagers attended the evening, and – of the 65 people who left feedback – six were in favour, 56 against and three expressed no opinion.

Melbourn Parish Council recommended to refuse the application and requested that it go to South Cambs District Council’s planning committee, and the spokeswoman said the parish council will continue its commitment to keep the village informed of developments.

A spokesman for Countryside Properties said:“The proposed 160 home development includes a balanced mix of one bedroom to five bedroom properties, of which 40 per cent will be affordable homes.

“We believe our approach is respectful to the existing area, while providing a much needed diverse mix of well-designed new homes and a high quality public realm.”

0 comments

Welcome , please leave your message below.

Optional - JPG files only
Optional - MP3 files only
Optional - 3GP, AVI, MOV, MPG or WMV files
Comments

Please log in to leave a comment and share your views with other Royston Crow visitors.

We enable people to post comments with the aim of encouraging open debate.

Only people who register and sign up to our terms and conditions can post comments. These terms and conditions explain our house rules and legal guidelines.

Comments are not edited by Royston Crow staff prior to publication but may be automatically filtered.

If you have a complaint about a comment please contact us by clicking on the Report This Comment button next to the comment.

Not a member yet?

Register to create your own unique Royston Crow account for free.

Signing up is free, quick and easy and offers you the chance to add comments, personalise the site with local information picked just for you, and more.

Sign up now

More news stories

Yesterday, 17:51

There’s less than one week left to respond to Hertfordshire County Council’s Local Transport Plan, which the council says will mean a major shakeup of the county’s transport networks in a bid to help them cope in the future.

Yesterday, 15:45

A development of almost 300 homes on the edge of Royston is one step closer after the planning application received the go-ahead on Wednesday night.

Yesterday, 15:09

North Herts District Council’s members last night voted themselves a two-per-cent allowance rise.

With councils being ordered to build thousands of new homes by the Government, the question of whether there are any alternative approaches to getting people housed is an important one.

”North

Most read stories

HOT JOBS

Show Job Lists

Digital Edition

Image
Read the Royston Crow e-edition E-edition

Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to receive our regular email newsletter